<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The &#8220;joke&#8221; that is the Philippines party-list system</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fruitsandvotes.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=6467" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fruitsandvotes.com/?p=6467</link>
	<description>The Weblog of Matthew S. Shugart</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:50:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Anand</title>
		<link>http://fruitsandvotes.com/?p=6467#comment-187948</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Anand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2012 23:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fruitsandvotes.com/?p=6467#comment-187948</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t the Philipino system be more proportionate than a true MMM system, as it disproportionately favours small parties compared to large ones. This would in effect counterbalance the FPTP tier?

Of course, I assume parties may abuse this feature by splitting their lists up.

By the way, is it one vote or two vote?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t the Philipino system be more proportionate than a true MMM system, as it disproportionately favours small parties compared to large ones. This would in effect counterbalance the FPTP tier?</p>
<p>Of course, I assume parties may abuse this feature by splitting their lists up.</p>
<p>By the way, is it one vote or two vote?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
