THE CORE

Fruits & Votes is the Web-log of Matthew S. Shugart ("MSS"), Professor of Political Science, University of California, Davis.

Perspectives on electoral systems, constitutional design, and policy around the world, based primarily on my research interests.

Also experiences with growing many varieties of fruit (always organic) and other personal interests. Please see the Mission Statement for more. (There is also an explanation of the banner.)

Other "planters" have been invited to contribute. Please check the "Planted by" line to see the author of the post you are reading.

Join the conversation. Comments are always open. Except, that is, when Word Press mysteriously shuts them down, which happens with distressing frequency.

Core principles:

Henry Droop on the "moderate non-partisan section"

Madison on "dangers from abroad" and "the fetters... on liberty"

The Head Orchardist's other sites:

PRESERVED FRUIT
orchard blocks
  • All
  • FRUITS
  • VOTES
  • wide open spaces
  • 25 October 2007

    Planted by MSS
    Planted in: The Ballyard

    It’s great to be back in the old ballyard!

    The other day, while lying around wondering if we were going to be evacuated or not (can’t do any real work, nor sleep, in such circumstances) I added up the runs scored and allowed by the Rockies in their incredible 21-1 run from 16 Sept. through the NLCS.

    The result is, well, incredible.

    Through the end of the regular season, 102-52.

    Through the postseason sweeps of Philadelphia and Arizona: 34-16.

    Full period from 16 Sept. to 15 Oct.: 136-68.

    Any time you are doubling up your opponent’s runs on a regular basis, you are doing pretty well.

    Then came game 1 of the World Series: 1-13. Ouch. Reality sets in. The Rockies probably really were the best in the NL over the full season–even if it took an incredible run with much good fortune to make it happen. According to the Bill James Pythagorean Baseball Theorem–that is, expected W-L based on runs scored and allowed–the Rockies actually slightly under-achieved during the season. They should have been 92-71 (in 163 games, though in this hypothetical world, they would have played just 162), a record with which they would have won the west by a game or two over relatively easy “shoulda-been” wild-card winner, San Diego. So, their run after 16 Sept. was nothing but a “late-course correction,” albeit probably the most implausible one of all time given how time was running out on the season.1

    Now the NL’s best is up against clearly the best team2 in a far superior league. The AL champion just demolished a very good Cleveland team, which is certainly much superior to the Rockies. Oh, sure, that series went the full seven and the Red Sox trailed, 3 games to 1, after the first four. But while the Indians made the series interesting, in the end the series only showed what a dominant team the Red Sox are. They outscored the Indians, 51-32. Any time you are outscoring your opponent by a factor of almost 1.6, you are doing pretty well.3

    Is continuing to be on the wrong end of a 13:1 scoring ratio in the Rockies’ near-term future? Surely not. But they would have to have considerable good fortune to win this series, given that the AL’s continuing superiority has again guaranteed its champion up to four home games. Both teams have remarkably strong home-field advantages, based on home records during the regular season (51-30 for Boston, 51-31 for Colorado). Yet the Red Sox were a far better road team (45-36) during the season than were the Rockies (a mere 39-42), and the latter team obviously must win at least one game in Boston to have any hope in this series. Given that Josh Beckett, as dominant as he is right now, is not likely to be too adversely affected in his Game 5 start in Denver (if the series even goes that far), a Colorado sweep of its home games seems unlikely. In that case, they need two wins in Boston. Tall order.

    It would be foolish to predict a sweep, so I will not. And if the Rockies somehow win tonight, the Series will at least be interesting. From a fan-interest perspective, it is a shame that game 7 of the ALCS was effectively over as early as was game 1 of the current series, because it was probably the last game 7 baseball fans will see for a year. If the Red Sox do not win this in five or six, it will be quite an upset. A sweep would be less than a shock. But I won’t predict one. That would be foolish.

    So, when do pitchers and catchers report?

    1. At the start of play that day the Rockies were 76-72, which was three games worse than their then-expected W-L, or the same deficit of reality from expectation that they would have at the end. How much did they over-achieve during their 21-1 run? At such a small number of games, the Pythagorean estimates are not going to tell us as much, but a team with their runs scored and allowed during those 22 games should go about 18 and 4. So, they were only 3 games above expectation. That’s how good they were during this run. For those final 14 regular-season games, excluding the extra playoff to break the wild-card tie with the Padres, they would be expected to have been about 11-3. Of course, given how they had underachieved through 16 Sept. and how the Diamondbacks (who should have ended up 79-83) over-achieved all season, the Rockies needed every one of those excess wins! And their one loss in the final 14 games of the 162-game season almost cost them their well deserved postseason berth. []
    2. The Red Sox scored 867-657 during the season, which would translate into an expected 103-59! They were “only” 96-66, same as the Indians (whose expected W-L was just 92-70). Under-achievers, those Sox! As more testament to how good the AL East is, all the teams except Baltimore actually underplayed their expectations, and Baltimore was only 1 game better than expected. The Yankees ought to have been 99-63. []
    3. Of course, outscoring your opponent, even by a very wide margin, is no guarantee of winning a series. Just ask the 1960 Yankees! []

    Propagation: Seeds & scions (0)


    Nothing sprouting from this planting yet »

    RSS feed for comments on this post.

    TrackBacks

    To graft a scion to this planting, please use the following URL:
    http://fruitsandvotes.com/blog/wp-trackback.php?p=1412
    (Non-MT bloggers click here to send pings.)

    Grafted scions that are not compatible with this planting's stock will die or be pruned out by the Orchardist.

    About the comment form

    Please note that the name you enter below and the first several words of your comment will appear on the right sidebar of the blog's front page, under "Propagation." New propagators might want to look at the comment policy.

    Please do not enter long URLs into the seedbed. Either mark them up using html hyperlinks or convert them to a "tiny URL." Thank you!

    Seedbed

    The soil is ready for planting:

    `

    FRUIT FEEDS
    PROPAGATION
    Recent comments.

  • Is MMP in Ireland’s future? (20)
    • Derek: Actually, the proposal I’m considering is a system where all candidates must run for many district seats and the number of seats...
    • MSS: I would completely reject Ed’s notion that members elected on party lists (closed) are “appointe d” instead of elected....
    • MSS: Interesting on attitudes towards STV variants, Tom! As for Hungary, it is not, and never was, MMP. But the system was indeed adopted before...
    • JD: How about the following MMP variant: both constituency and party-list votes are ranked. The constituency contest happens under AV. The...
    • Tom Round: (MSS @9) “To be clear, no specific legal threshold, or any threshold at all, is a defining feature of MMP” True. However,...
    • Mark Roth: @ JD, I stand corrected. @Derek, I believe that someone proposed something similarish for Canada right after the last federal election....
    • Derek: I’ve always thought of a different type of MMP system. The % for the winning party determines the number of seats chosen proportiona...
    • Suaprazzodi: Will Ireland embrace a one vote or two vote MMP system? Will it use FPTP in conjunction with a closed party list corrective element...
    • JD: Mark: If I’m not mistaken, neither Bolivia nor Lesotho (both MMP users) have thresholds.
    • Ed: I had a somewhat similar intellectual journey to Tom Round, in that MMP was beguiling at first until you got into the details. For me the deal...
    • Mark Roth: Just to be argumentative,a nd with no offense meant: 1) As far as I know, every system that uses MMP does have some sort of threshold in...
    • MSS: To be clear, no specific legal threshold, or any threshold at all, is a defining feature of MMP. Technically, neither are single-seat...
    • Tom Round: I’m not unfamiliar with the attraction of MMP. I felt it myself when I first started studying electoral systems. It retains...
  • Pakistan general election 2013 (2)
    • MSS: The bandwagoning is taking place now. “PML-N gets majority after 18 Independents join party” (20 May). “43 newly elected...
  • CROSS-POLLINATION

    FRUITS

    morn_blms_corralito.jpg

    The Fruit Blog (Fruit & fruit breeding)
    Daley's Fruit Tree Blog
    Orchards Forever
    The Orchard Keeper
    The Ethicurean
    The Jew and the Carrot
    Small farms ("real people & real food")
    Life begins at 30 (Farmers markets, etc.)
    Banana
    Festival of Trees
    Rare Fruit News Online
    Cloudforest Cafe


    VOTES

    bulgaria_protest copy

    Comparative democracy

    Psephos (Adam Carr's data archive)
    Electoral Panorama
    World Elections
    African Elections Database
    M. Herrera's Electoral Calendar
    Electoral Geography (Data archive)
    Michael Gallagher's data archive
    Election Finance (Blog, data archive)
    IFES
    Election Law (Rick Hasen)
    VoteLaw (Edward Still)
    Ballot Access News

    Electoral and Political Reform

    The FairVote Blog (US)
    Make my vote count (UK)
    Wilf Day (Canada)
    democraticSPACE (Canada)
    Citizens Assembly Blog (dormant)


    POLITOLOGY

    Blogs of political analysis

    PoliBlog
    Arms and Influence (dormant)
    Outside the Beltway
    Political Science Weblog (abstracts)
    Ideological Cartography (Adam Bonica)
    Frontloading HQ (Josh Putnam)
    FiveThirtyEight
    Vote View (Keith Poole)
    The Monkey Cage
    A Plain Blog About Politics (Jonathan Bernstein)
    Political Arithmetik (dormant)
    Polls & Votes
    Pollster.com
    Polysigh
    Reflective Pundit
    Rustbelt Intellectual
    Simon Jackman
    The semi-presidential one
    Josep Colomer
    Chapel Hill Treehouse (dormant)
    Political Behavior (dormant)
    Dart-Throwing Chimp
    Countries at the Crossroads (Freedom House blog)
    Jacob T. Levy

    REGIONAL ANALYSIS

    Canada

    The Mace
    ThreeHundredEight
    Crawl Across the Ocean
    Idealistic Pragmatist

    Europe

    Centre for European Politics
    Dr Sean's Diary
    A Fistful of Euros
    Political Reform (Ireland)
    UK Polling Report
    British Politics & Policy (LSE)

    Latin America

    Bloggings by boz
    Two Weeks Notice

    S.W. Asia & E. Mediterranean & N. Africa

    Informed Comment Global Affairs
    Lisa Goldman
    Michael J. Totten
    Yaacov Lozowick
    Marc Lynch (@FP)
    Ahwa Talk

    Africa

    La Constitution en Afrique

    E. Asia

    Frozen Garlic (Taiwan elections)

    New Zealand

    Kiwiblog
    No Right Turn

    OTHER SOCIAL SCIENCE BLOGS

    Crooked Timber
    Statistical Modeling
    Social Science Statistics
    Cold Spring Shops
    Marginal Revolution
    Brad DeLong
    Greg Mankiw

    SUN & MOON

    CURRENT MOON

    NEWS

    ABC

    BBC

    CBC

    Democracy Now!

    Deutsche Welle

    El Tiempo

    Guardian

    Haaretz

    Hindustan Times

    The Independent

    Irish Times

    NZ Stuff

    RFE/RL

    ORGANIZATIONS

    About/disclaimer

    California Rare Fruit Growers

    Center for Voting and Democracy

    Californians for Electoral Reform

    Society for American Baseball Research

    Link TV

    SCION EXCHANGE

    HARVESTS
    ORCHARD SERVICES

    Powered by WordPress