I received this appeal from John Anderson today. I make such a contribution every year, and I hope some of my pro-reform American readers will consider doing the same:
December 18, 2007
My fellow friends and supporters of FairVote,
I write from my law school office in Florida, having just put the final touches on another semester of teaching constitutional law. Perhaps it is my regular opportunity to engage so intensely with our nation’s future leaders that stirs in me an ongoing passion to have our nation move to democracy’s cutting edge. Certainly it serves to reinforce one of my deepest commitments: the remarkable work of FairVote as it advances “the way democracy will be.â€
I know many of you already appreciate FairVote’s work. Each year our supporters grow in their number and giving, with their recognition of our unique position: we are the one national organization winning a full range of structural reforms necessary to free the voter from the chains of America’s 18th century electoral laws. We turn every gift into innovative thinking, strategic advocacy and one more step toward a democracy that can meet today’s challenges.
Allow me to be as bold as FairVote’s mission: please consider a donation to FairVote this year, as we move to the next level of reform impact. I firmly believe that our time is not coming. It is here. And we need your help.
It’s hard to convey all the successes of our dedicated staff. Rob Richie’s report is a good start. Perusing fairvote.org is even better. But I wish you could have joined me for our Claim Democracy conference and intensive training session with advocates of instant runoff voting and proportional voting from across the nation. Our board meetings sparkle with ideas. You would feel the energy – and see how much change flows from our work.
I wanted to give special thanks to those of you who filled the hall for our 15th Anniversary dinner. The staff surprised me with a tribute, and being there with family and so many FairVote allies made for a moving evening. Fellow board members Krist Novoselic, Eddie Hailes and Rick Hertzberg spoke powerfully about FairVote’s remarkable progress and exciting future. Change is coming, and it is a joy to have an opportunity to be part of it.
My profound thanks and best wishes to you and your family at this special time of year.
Yours sincerely,
John B. Anderson
Chair, FairVote Board of Directors
John Anderson was the first presidential candidate whose campaign I ever worked for, and also the first I voted for. In fact, I was the Garden Grove Area Petition Coordinator, helping him get on the ballot in California in 1980. I wish I had a photo of the old red Cougar I was driving back then and dubbed The Andersonmobile for the multiple (and also red) Anderson stickers affixed to it. I even briefly participated in a movement to draft him as the Reform Party nominee in 2000, but it was clear that Anderson was not interested and the Reform Party wasn’t worthy of either word in its name.1
I had the pleasure of meeting him for coffee about six years ago (when he was in San Diego with the World Federalist Movement). That makes him one of three presidential candidates I ever have had the opportunity to meet personally (the others being Ralph Nader and Bill Richardson). Anderson’s commitment to reform impressed me in 1980–when I supported him as much for his energy-saving gas-tax increase as for anything else. He still impresses me today, especially for his role with Fairvote.
_____
- Let me make clear that the faction–groupuscule would be more like it–that I was loosely involved with had no connection to the eventual Reform nominee, Pat Buchanan. Many of its members were, in addition to Anderson, also interested in drafting John McCain, but most eventually turned to Ralph Nader. [↩]



And the Congressman still gives a rousing speech. He meets with the DC staff a couple times each year in addition to helping out on the ground, with the media, etc.
FairVote was a remarkable place to work. Every day you take on the odds, and despite the predictions, reform happens. It’s proof that many people, including some incumbent policy-makers, like the idea of reform when they hear about it.
Thanks for this post.
Seed planted by Jack — 21 December 2007 @ 15:29
Fairvote is out with a new PR scheme. It’s MMP, but in true FairVote fashion, they’ve decided to come up with an entirely unnecessary new name for it: “Districts Plus.”
Their example is for Michigan’s House of Representatives. They would have 80% of the seats (88) elected by SMD and 20% (22 seats) elected by statewide PR. The total seats would be based on statewide performance, but which seats would be elected would not be based on a list, but instead by how well the party performed in each of 22 adjustment regions, each with its own nominee for each party.
It’s not a terrible idea, and it’s possible that this kind of idea could gain traction in the US, but if it’s ever adopted, I can’t wait for people to complain about the “loser” winning in an adjustment district.
http://www.fairvote.org/districts-plus#.UVxxghn9rxY
Seed planted by Chris — 03 April 2013 @ 14:31
Characteristically, “District Plus” is as bad as it can be and still count as an improvement.
Seed planted by Aaron Armitage — 04 April 2013 @ 18:11
Fair Vote, and US good government advocates generally, need to get beyond this strategy of propose it and they will come. The long historical evidence from the US, where electoral practice starts fairly low and shows signs of improvement at only a glacial pace, is simply that they won’t come.
Australia used to an electoral system that was the equal of any in the world for malapportionment, gerrymandering and general shenanigans of all kinds. Australia no longer has such a system because a couple of parties, Labor first among them, committed themselves to reform.
It strikes me that the endless production of new plans with new names is not really a useful activity, any more than the all too frequent posture of advocacy not of electoral reform, but of a particular electoral reform or keeping the present system, is a path that leads to change.
It also seems to me that the division of reformers into what, for want of better, we might call the Balkinization faction and the Fruits and Votes faction, is deeply unhelpful.
Seed planted by Alan — 05 April 2013 @ 22:45
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-03-30/news/ct-oped-0329-vote-20120330_1_cumulative-voting-voting-system-voting-rights-act
John Anderson continuing his advocacy of fairer voting systems with an appeal a few weeks ago for the return of Illinois’ cumulative voting system for the legislature. A poor substitute for ‘Choice Voting’ and ‘Districts Plus,’ but a substantial improvement over SMD.
Seed planted by Chris — 16 April 2013 @ 09:58
Slight correction: the article is from March 2012, so a month ago, but relevant nonetheless
Seed planted by Chris — 16 April 2013 @ 10:56
That should be, ‘so not a month ago’, but rather a year ago.
Seed planted by Chris — 16 April 2013 @ 12:07