THE CORE

Fruits & Votes is the Web-log of Matthew S. Shugart ("MSS"), Professor of Political Science, University of California, Davis.

Perspectives on electoral systems, constitutional design, and policy around the world, based primarily on my research interests.

Also experiences with growing many varieties of fruit (always organic) and other personal interests. Please see the Mission Statement for more. (There is also an explanation of the banner.)

Other "planters" have been invited to contribute. Please check the "Planted by" line to see the author of the post you are reading.

Join the conversation. Comments are always open. Except, that is, when Word Press mysteriously shuts them down, which happens with distressing frequency.

Core principles:

Henry Droop on the "moderate non-partisan section"

Madison on "dangers from abroad" and "the fetters... on liberty"

The Head Orchardist's other sites:

PRESERVED FRUIT
orchard blocks
  • All
  • FRUITS
  • VOTES
  • wide open spaces
  • 11 April 2008

    Planted by MSS
    Planted in: Italy

    Anyone want to talk about Italy’s election?

    The Italy block here at F&V contains several previous plantings on the electoral system. This election will be the second running of the system put in place just in time for the 2005 election: Majoritarian by pre-election bloc, proportional within blocs.

    Propagation: Seeds & scions (13)


    Fruits and Votes grafted Italian electoral system performance, 2008 vs. 2006
    The Democratic Piece grafted Toward a more stable Italian left?
    PoliBlog grafted C-SPAN Would Get Higher Ratings if More US Politicians Were Like This…

    13 ideas sprouting »

    1. I’ve been to a few talks here in DC about the elections. Most are predicting a Berlusconi win. The bigger question is whether Casini’s UDC will be kingmaker or Veltroni and Berlusconi will go into grand coalition and amend the electoral law.

      One Brookings panelist noted yesterday how Veltroni’s exclusion of the “far” left from his coalition is a milestone in Italian politics. Leftist coalitions traditionally have been built on some compromise between the “far” and moderate wings. If this is an enduring change to the Italian party system, it’ll be interesting to look at more closely.

      Others were talking about the shift of campaign emphasis from party ID to the charisma of the three front-runners (Casini, Berlusconi, Veltroni).

      Issues came up. Foreign policy off the table – less Iraq, more Afghanistan, regardless of who’s in charge. The economy is big: unemployment, repealing the “first home” tax, reform, and so forth.

      In the interest of shameless (but relevant) self-promotion, here are some photos I took of the campaign last month.

      Seed planted by Jack — 11 April 2008 @ 15:09

    2. Should the form of electoral system be protected by being incorporated in the constitution? Of course it wouldn’t stop manipulation, but it would make the kind of opportunism that led to Italy’s bizarre system possible.

      Is there any significant prospect of eliminating the arbitrary age limits on voting for (let alone being) Senators? I wonder too at the equal bicameralism. Its virtually unique in a parliamentary system, isn’t it?

      Seed planted by Dermot — 11 April 2008 @ 17:48

    3. Absolutely, NOT! The idea to “constitutionalize” electoral law is, at least in Italy, foolish. Who, in that unlucky case, will be able to change a awkful electoral system?! Italian political system needs flexibility in order to change its anachronistic political institutions and mechanisms, not fossilization!
      By the way, Berlsuconi, fifth time candidate Prime Minister, 72 years-old, is going to win easily, in both congruent Chambers, perhaps (and plainly) with more difficulties and less margine of victory at the Senate. Therefore, nothing new under italian sun…

      Seed planted by Leonardo — 11 April 2008 @ 19:16

    4. C-SPAN Would Get Higher Ratings if More US Politicians Were Like This…

      Via Reuters: Porn star unveils campaign weapon-her bottom…

      Scion grafted by PoliBlog — 12 April 2008 @ 11:57

    5. But Leonardo, that is precisely the point-no system is perfect, but a system that wins consensus could be more readily protected from manipulation by simple majorities trying to protect themselves from popular will by being enshrined in the constitution. Particularly because Italian politics can be so cynical.

      Seed planted by Dermot — 12 April 2008 @ 19:23

    6. Two elections, same electoral system, and not only different but extremely divergent electoral results. Before this election, we had the most fragmented Parliament of the Italian Republic; after this election (most probably) the least fragmented one. What about the theory? What influences what? Electoral systems (or “containers”) matter but, at least in this case, “content” matters enormously more!

      Seed planted by Marco — 15 April 2008 @ 00:08

    7. No Communists elected to either chamber – first time since 1946.

      Seed planted by Tom Round — 15 April 2008 @ 07:14

    8. With the caveat that I have yet to look closely at the results, I would point out that a reduction in the number of parties is what we would expect given the majoritarian nature of the system now used for a second time.

      Seed planted by MSS — 15 April 2008 @ 12:27

    9. If Tom is right about no communists being elected, Veltroni’s decision to exclude them from the center-left apparentement was important.

      Late last week, a speaker at Brookings was suggesting exactly this. That is, while incurring a short-term electoral cost by abandoning moderate/extreme left compromise in this round, the decision could turn out to be a bellwether for the Italian party system. If:

      1) the decision sticks,

      2) we are seeing strategic abandonment of extreme left for more moderate left parties,

      We might expect more stable center-left coalitions in the future.

      Something else I need to blog once the week’s coursework is done.

      Seed planted by Jack — 15 April 2008 @ 13:42

    10. Toward a more stable Italian left?

      There is reason to believe we are witnessing a seismic shift in the Italian party system. The next time a center-left coalition comes to power, it has a good shot at finishing its term.

      Scion grafted by The Democratic Piece — 15 April 2008 @ 14:46

    11. Looking at the results, it appears that the UDC is the crucial component for any center-left win. Had the UDC tilted for Veltroni, the Pd might have outscored Berlusconi’s Pdl by a nose.

      Happy to say that Toscana, Emilia Romagna, Umbria and Le Marche went convincingly for the Pd.

      In Vento, shamefully the Lega Nord, in the Berlusconi’s coalition, outpolled El Berlusko’s Pdl itself.

      The South went for Pdl in a big way. They must appreciate his macho.

      Seed planted by Corenna — 15 April 2008 @ 14:57

    12. I’m not really sure one can say that the UDC is crucial, since one can’t really sum the parties’ votes in this way. The radical left claims that the result would have been closer if Veltroni had included them in the coalition; but if he had done so, the PD would have had even greater difficulty in attracting moderate voters. Equally, had the UDC gone with the PD, it would have lost many former Communist voters (2 of 10) who switched to the PD in order not to waste their vote. UDC link ups at local level may work – that’s why Veltroni is suggesting that the UDC should support Rutelli in the Rome mayoral contest.

      Seed planted by Chris Hanretty — 17 April 2008 @ 13:01

    13. Italian electoral system performance, 2008 vs. 2006

      It is really hard to overstate just how much this electoral system is majoritarian. It just looked less majoritarian in 2006 than it would in 2008. Italy’s electoral system is one of the strangest and most complex around. But in its second run, it produced a decisive result in both houses and the closest thing Italy has seen yet to the vaunted “two-party system.”

      Scion grafted by Fruits and Votes — 17 April 2008 @ 16:05

    RSS feed for comments on this post.

    TrackBacks

    To graft a scion to this planting, please use the following URL:
    http://fruitsandvotes.com/blog/wp-trackback.php?p=1638
    (Non-MT bloggers click here to send pings.)

    Grafted scions that are not compatible with this planting's stock will die or be pruned out by the Orchardist.

    About the comment form

    Please note that the name you enter below and the first several words of your comment will appear on the right sidebar of the blog's front page, under "Propagation." New propagators might want to look at the comment policy.

    Please do not enter long URLs into the seedbed. Either mark them up using html hyperlinks or convert them to a "tiny URL." Thank you!

    Seedbed

    The soil is ready for planting:

    `

    FRUIT FEEDS
    PROPAGATION
    Recent comments.

  • Is MMP in Ireland’s future? (21)
    • Tom Round: MSS @19: I’d semi-agree that party-list legislators are still “elected& #8221; (at least when the lists are published in...
    • Derek: Actually, the proposal I’m considering is a system where all candidates must run for many district seats and the number of seats...
    • MSS: I would completely reject Ed’s notion that members elected on party lists (closed) are “appointe d” instead of elected....
    • MSS: Interesting on attitudes towards STV variants, Tom! As for Hungary, it is not, and never was, MMP. But the system was indeed adopted before...
    • JD: How about the following MMP variant: both constituency and party-list votes are ranked. The constituency contest happens under AV. The...
    • Tom Round: (MSS @9) “To be clear, no specific legal threshold, or any threshold at all, is a defining feature of MMP” True. However,...
    • Mark Roth: @ JD, I stand corrected. @Derek, I believe that someone proposed something similarish for Canada right after the last federal election....
    • Derek: I’ve always thought of a different type of MMP system. The % for the winning party determines the number of seats chosen proportiona...
    • Suaprazzodi: Will Ireland embrace a one vote or two vote MMP system? Will it use FPTP in conjunction with a closed party list corrective element...
    • JD: Mark: If I’m not mistaken, neither Bolivia nor Lesotho (both MMP users) have thresholds.
    • Ed: I had a somewhat similar intellectual journey to Tom Round, in that MMP was beguiling at first until you got into the details. For me the deal...
    • Mark Roth: Just to be argumentative,a nd with no offense meant: 1) As far as I know, every system that uses MMP does have some sort of threshold in...
    • MSS: To be clear, no specific legal threshold, or any threshold at all, is a defining feature of MMP. Technically, neither are single-seat...
  • Pakistan general election 2013 (2)
    • MSS: The bandwagoning is taking place now. “PML-N gets majority after 18 Independents join party” (20 May). “43 newly elected...
  • CROSS-POLLINATION

    FRUITS

    morn_blms_corralito.jpg

    The Fruit Blog (Fruit & fruit breeding)
    Daley's Fruit Tree Blog
    Orchards Forever
    The Orchard Keeper
    The Ethicurean
    The Jew and the Carrot
    Small farms ("real people & real food")
    Life begins at 30 (Farmers markets, etc.)
    Banana
    Festival of Trees
    Rare Fruit News Online
    Cloudforest Cafe


    VOTES

    bulgaria_protest copy

    Comparative democracy

    Psephos (Adam Carr's data archive)
    Electoral Panorama
    World Elections
    African Elections Database
    M. Herrera's Electoral Calendar
    Electoral Geography (Data archive)
    Michael Gallagher's data archive
    Election Finance (Blog, data archive)
    IFES
    Election Law (Rick Hasen)
    VoteLaw (Edward Still)
    Ballot Access News

    Electoral and Political Reform

    The FairVote Blog (US)
    Make my vote count (UK)
    Wilf Day (Canada)
    democraticSPACE (Canada)
    Citizens Assembly Blog (dormant)


    POLITOLOGY

    Blogs of political analysis

    PoliBlog
    Arms and Influence (dormant)
    Outside the Beltway
    Political Science Weblog (abstracts)
    Ideological Cartography (Adam Bonica)
    Frontloading HQ (Josh Putnam)
    FiveThirtyEight
    Vote View (Keith Poole)
    The Monkey Cage
    A Plain Blog About Politics (Jonathan Bernstein)
    Political Arithmetik (dormant)
    Polls & Votes
    Pollster.com
    Polysigh
    Reflective Pundit
    Rustbelt Intellectual
    Simon Jackman
    The semi-presidential one
    Josep Colomer
    Chapel Hill Treehouse (dormant)
    Political Behavior (dormant)
    Dart-Throwing Chimp
    Countries at the Crossroads (Freedom House blog)
    Jacob T. Levy

    REGIONAL ANALYSIS

    Canada

    The Mace
    ThreeHundredEight
    Crawl Across the Ocean
    Idealistic Pragmatist

    Europe

    Centre for European Politics
    Dr Sean's Diary
    A Fistful of Euros
    Political Reform (Ireland)
    UK Polling Report
    British Politics & Policy (LSE)

    Latin America

    Bloggings by boz
    Two Weeks Notice

    S.W. Asia & E. Mediterranean & N. Africa

    Informed Comment Global Affairs
    Lisa Goldman
    Michael J. Totten
    Yaacov Lozowick
    Marc Lynch (@FP)
    Ahwa Talk

    Africa

    La Constitution en Afrique

    E. Asia

    Frozen Garlic (Taiwan elections)

    New Zealand

    Kiwiblog
    No Right Turn

    OTHER SOCIAL SCIENCE BLOGS

    Crooked Timber
    Statistical Modeling
    Social Science Statistics
    Cold Spring Shops
    Marginal Revolution
    Brad DeLong
    Greg Mankiw

    SUN & MOON

    CURRENT MOON

    NEWS

    ABC

    BBC

    CBC

    Democracy Now!

    Deutsche Welle

    El Tiempo

    Guardian

    Haaretz

    Hindustan Times

    The Independent

    Irish Times

    NZ Stuff

    RFE/RL

    ORGANIZATIONS

    About/disclaimer

    California Rare Fruit Growers

    Center for Voting and Democracy

    Californians for Electoral Reform

    Society for American Baseball Research

    Link TV

    SCION EXCHANGE

    HARVESTS
    ORCHARD SERVICES

    Powered by WordPress