Does anyone want to talk about the European Parliament elections? They start tomorrow, and quite apart from the body actually being elected, they could have some pretty significant impacts on certain European countries’ governments.
![]() |
THE CORE
Fruits & Votes is the Web-log of Matthew S. Shugart ("MSS"), Professor of Political Science, University of California, Davis.
Perspectives on electoral systems, constitutional design, and policy around the world, based primarily on my research interests. Also experiences with growing many varieties of fruit (always organic) and other personal interests. Please see the Mission Statement for more. (There is also an explanation of the banner.) Other "planters" have been invited to contribute. Please check the "Planted by" line to see the author of the post you are reading.
Join the conversation. Comments are always open. Except, that is, when Word Press mysteriously shuts them down, which happens with distressing frequency. Core principles: Henry Droop on the "moderate non-partisan section" Madison on "dangers from abroad" and "the fetters... on liberty" The Head Orchardist's other sites: PRESERVED FRUIT Dikes and Votes: Consensus government and flood control The 2008 candidates on political reform More fundamental than the climate The radical middle in US democracy Canada's dysfunctional electoral system The Hamas sweep: The electoral system did it
orchard blocks
|
03 June 2009
Does anyone want to talk about the European Parliament elections? They start tomorrow, and quite apart from the body actually being elected, they could have some pretty significant impacts on certain European countries’ governments. Propagation: Seeds & scions (13) 13 ideas sprouting »RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBacks
To graft a scion to this planting, please use the following URL: Grafted scions that are not compatible with this planting's stock will die or be pruned out by the Orchardist. About the comment formPlease note that the name you enter below and the first several words of your comment will appear on the right sidebar of the blog's front page, under "Propagation." New propagators might want to look at the comment policy. Please do not enter long URLs into the seedbed. Either mark them up using html hyperlinks or convert them to a "tiny URL." Thank you! SeedbedThe soil is ready for planting: ` |
FRUIT FEEDS
PROPAGATION
Recent comments.
CROSS-POLLINATION
FRUITS
![]()
The Fruit Blog (Fruit & fruit breeding)
![]()
Comparative democracy Electoral Panorama World Elections African Elections Database M. Herrera's Electoral Calendar Electoral Geography (Data archive) Michael Gallagher's data archive Election Finance (Blog, data archive) IFES Election Law (Rick Hasen) VoteLaw (Edward Still) Ballot Access News Electoral and Political Reform The FairVote Blog (US)
Blogs of political analysis PoliBlogArms and Influence (dormant) Outside the Beltway Political Science Weblog (abstracts) Ideological Cartography (Adam Bonica) Frontloading HQ (Josh Putnam) FiveThirtyEight Vote View (Keith Poole) The Monkey Cage A Plain Blog About Politics (Jonathan Bernstein) Political Arithmetik (dormant) Polls & Votes Pollster.com Polysigh Reflective Pundit Rustbelt Intellectual Simon Jackman The semi-presidential one Josep Colomer Chapel Hill Treehouse (dormant) Political Behavior (dormant) Dart-Throwing Chimp Countries at the Crossroads (Freedom House blog) Jacob T. Levy REGIONAL ANALYSIS
The Mace
Centre for European Politics
Bloggings by boz
Informed Comment Global Affairs
Frozen Garlic (Taiwan elections) OTHER SOCIAL SCIENCE BLOGS
Crooked Timber
CURRENT MOON NEWS ORGANIZATIONS Center for Voting and Democracy Californians for Electoral Reform SCION EXCHANGE
Bloggers who link or comment here (if not listed elsewhere on this page)
Afbau Ost HARVESTS
If by my laws you walk, and my commands you keep, and observe them,
May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005
ORCHARD SERVICES F&V time: This blog's date function is so set as to start a new day at approximately local sunset. (Why, if we have "day" and "night," should a new "day" start in the middle of the night?) FRUITS: Support your local, organic growers; and, plant vines and fig trees and pomegranates for the generations to come...
VOTES: For democratization and full representation, for environmental sustainability, social justice, and peace, always sincerely... |
Powered by WordPress
“…. on the eve of Thursday’s elections for the European Parliament and 34 local councils in England…”
Why (only) 34? Surely there’s more than that?
Seed planted by Tom Round — 04 June 2009 @ 01:20
Once we’ve laid down the law for California we could have a lot of fun with international assemblies. The AU and USAN are planning their own equivalents of the European parliament and given that North America is already fairly closely to economic union there should prolly also be an UNAN parliament.
Seed planted by Alan — 04 June 2009 @ 02:31
In the EP, there is no lasting predictable majority/opposition-divide. This is its major weakness and its major strength:
* the weakness is, you cannot transplant explanatory schemes from national (adversarial) politics to EP (consensus) politics; so it is hard for the media to explain in simple words what’s going on; low media coverage is one of the reasons for the low turnout.
* the strength is, individual MPs (‘MEPs’) can make the difference.
Seed planted by Bancki — 04 June 2009 @ 04:19
@Tom Round: For whatever reason, the UK has a system with rotating local elections. A short introduction on Wikipedia.
Sweden: The two big questions seem to be 1. Will the “Pirate Party” make it to the EP, 2. Will the Conservatives or the Social Democrats be the largest party. Turn-out in Sweden will probably be under 40%.
Denmark: No really big issues in the campaign. The Social Democrats look a bit shaky though and have proposed reintroducing border controls in the last days of the campaign.
The election is the same day as the referendum on the Act of Succession and there is some excitement here as the act needs the support of 40% of all voters to pass.
Seed planted by Jacob Christensen — 04 June 2009 @ 06:49
What is being changed in the Act of Succession?
Seed planted by Alan — 04 June 2009 @ 09:26
I actually looked it up earlier, because I was curious myself. Basically, they will change the rules to say that the next person in line will take the throne, regardless of gender. The current rule in Denmark, under which Queen Margrethe II took the throne, says that a female heir can inherit the throne only if a male heir isn’t there.
Seed planted by Ren Aguila — 04 June 2009 @ 09:52
Gordon Brown proposed the same thing for the British succession law and deleting the ban on Catholics. That will take request and consent legislation from the parliament of every Commonwealth monarchy before it can be enacted. It would seem, on the other hand, that a Gordon Brown proposal may not have a very long shelf life.
Australia, uniquely in the rather ramshackle Commonwealth monarchy, can probably amend the succession law unilaterally. There was a brief push by an opposition leader in the 1980s to change the succession to create a local branch of the house of Windsor. There was also a certain amount of quixotic enthusiasm for acquiring the house of Slesvig-Holsten-Sønderborg-Glücksborg when an Australian married the crown prince of Denmark.
Seed planted by Alan — 04 June 2009 @ 11:29
In Spain, elections will take place on Sunday. According to most of the pre-electoral surveys, the non-governing PP (People’s Party) is going to defeat the incumbent PSOE (Socialist Party) by a small margin of vote (2 or 3 points). Hence, this could be the second time that the PSOE loses an election since Rodriguez-Zapatero became the PM in 2004 (the PP also won the 2007 local elections). The same surveys I have just mentioned tell us that each of the two big parties are going to win above 40 percent of the vote (minor parties are supposed to repeat more or less the same results than 5 years ago).
The campaign has focused on national issues. A very low turnout rate (40-45%) is also expected due to (among others) the scarce media coverage of the event. The turnout rate, the economic crisis and the erosion of the support of the Socialist Party after 5 years in government are commonly listed as the main factors that could explain the PP’s victory.
Seed planted by Pedro — 04 June 2009 @ 18:07
Well, that’s one thing Denmark and Australia have in common: you can’t be monarch of either country if you’re an Australian citizen.
Seed planted by Tom Round — 04 June 2009 @ 18:28
Queen Elizabeth is the queen of each Commonwealth realm independent of the others, and each and every realm has the power to amend the succession law that applies to its monarch. There is of course a preference for uniform rules of succession among the Commonwealth realms, so it’s unlikely that any one realm will go it alone with a new law.
On an entirely different note, do you suppose that the existence of supra-national PR elections in England makes it more likely that the UK will eventually switch away from FPTP? Should we hope that an (unlikely) future North American parliament would start the US and Canada on the road to PR?
Seed planted by Vasi — 04 June 2009 @ 20:03
@Vasi It depends on the extent to which and the terms in which the legislative power of the UK parliament was terminated and the transitional provisions made by ‘imperial’ act, the Commonwealth realm’s constitution, and certain other acts. Canada, for instance, entrenches everything to do with the monarchy by constitutional provision. Australia has a much looser arrangement where the monarchy, but none of its details, are entrenched and the Australia Act, a separate instrument from the constitution that was passed in the same form by the federal, state and British parliaments, would seem to vest the federal parliament with power to amend the succession as it applies in Australia.
The Statute of Westminster and the declarations of a string of Imperial Conferences laid down that the Act of Settlement (Imp) would not be amended except on the request and consent of the Commonwealth realms. The principle was followed in 1936 when the Commonwealth realms were asked to pass legislation confirming the abdication.
Austraia would certainly consent to equal primogeniture and an end to the Catholic ban. More seriously, the only feasible heir and successor to the house of Windsor is a future president of the republic.
Seed planted by Alan — 04 June 2009 @ 21:01
Preliminary results for the European Parliament election in the Netherlands are already in – much to the displeasure of EU officials, as they were not supposed to be published until Sunday evening – and the big winner is the right-wing populist Party for Freedom (PVV), which arrived second, just behind the Christian Democrats (CDA), the senior partner in the Dutch coalition government.
Amsterdam newsdaily De Telegraaf has detailed results in Dutch here.
Seed planted by Manuel Alvarez-Rivera — 05 June 2009 @ 13:21
Another way of looking at the diversity of the EU:
21 MEPs from regionalist and minority parties:
1 N-VA (Flanders, EPP)
3 DPS (Turkish-speaking Bulgarians, ALDE)
1 SFP (Swedish-sepaking Finns, ALDE)
1 SVP (Südtirol, German-speaking Italians, EPP)
2 SC (Russian-speaking Latvians)
1 LLRA (Polish-speaking Lithuanians)
3 UDMR / László T?kés) (Hungarian-speaking Romanians, EPP / Green-EFA)
2 SMK (Hungarian-speaking Slovaks, EPP)
1 CiU (Catalonia, ALDE)
1 EAJ-PNV (Euskadi, ALDE)
1 ERC (Catalonia, Green-EFA)
2 SNP (Scotland, Green-EFA)
1 PC (Wales, Green-EFA)
1 Sinn Fein (Northern Ireland, EUL-NGL)
Seed planted by Bancki — 17 June 2009 @ 10:04