I have been meaning for weeks to ask my readers for their thoughts on the annual prorogation of parliament in Stephen Harper’s Canada.
The last time Harper did this, we had quite a lively discussion.
![]() |
THE CORE
Fruits & Votes is the Web-log of Matthew S. Shugart ("MSS"), Professor of Political Science, University of California, Davis.
Perspectives on electoral systems, constitutional design, and policy around the world, based primarily on my research interests. Also experiences with growing many varieties of fruit (always organic) and other personal interests. Please see the Mission Statement for more. (There is also an explanation of the banner.) Other "planters" have been invited to contribute. Please check the "Planted by" line to see the author of the post you are reading.
Join the conversation. Comments are always open. Except, that is, when Word Press mysteriously shuts them down, which happens with distressing frequency. Core principles: Henry Droop on the "moderate non-partisan section" Madison on "dangers from abroad" and "the fetters... on liberty" The Head Orchardist's other sites: PRESERVED FRUIT Dikes and Votes: Consensus government and flood control The 2008 candidates on political reform More fundamental than the climate The radical middle in US democracy Canada's dysfunctional electoral system The Hamas sweep: The electoral system did it
orchard blocks
|
04 February 2010
I have been meaning for weeks to ask my readers for their thoughts on the annual prorogation of parliament in Stephen Harper’s Canada. The last time Harper did this, we had quite a lively discussion. Propagation: Seeds & scions (7) 7 ideas sprouting »RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBacks
To graft a scion to this planting, please use the following URL: Grafted scions that are not compatible with this planting's stock will die or be pruned out by the Orchardist. About the comment formPlease note that the name you enter below and the first several words of your comment will appear on the right sidebar of the blog's front page, under "Propagation." New propagators might want to look at the comment policy. Please do not enter long URLs into the seedbed. Either mark them up using html hyperlinks or convert them to a "tiny URL." Thank you! SeedbedThe soil is ready for planting: ` |
FRUIT FEEDS
PROPAGATION
Recent comments.
CROSS-POLLINATION
FRUITS
![]()
The Fruit Blog (Fruit & fruit breeding)
![]()
Comparative democracy Electoral Panorama World Elections African Elections Database M. Herrera's Electoral Calendar Electoral Geography (Data archive) Michael Gallagher's data archive Election Finance (Blog, data archive) IFES Election Law (Rick Hasen) VoteLaw (Edward Still) Ballot Access News Electoral and Political Reform The FairVote Blog (US)
Blogs of political analysis PoliBlogArms and Influence (dormant) Outside the Beltway Political Science Weblog (abstracts) Ideological Cartography (Adam Bonica) Frontloading HQ (Josh Putnam) FiveThirtyEight Vote View (Keith Poole) The Monkey Cage A Plain Blog About Politics (Jonathan Bernstein) Political Arithmetik (dormant) Polls & Votes Pollster.com Polysigh Reflective Pundit Rustbelt Intellectual Simon Jackman The semi-presidential one Josep Colomer Chapel Hill Treehouse (dormant) Political Behavior (dormant) Dart-Throwing Chimp Countries at the Crossroads (Freedom House blog) Jacob T. Levy REGIONAL ANALYSIS
The Mace
Centre for European Politics
Bloggings by boz
Informed Comment Global Affairs
Frozen Garlic (Taiwan elections) OTHER SOCIAL SCIENCE BLOGS
Crooked Timber
CURRENT MOON NEWS ORGANIZATIONS Center for Voting and Democracy Californians for Electoral Reform SCION EXCHANGE
Bloggers who link or comment here (if not listed elsewhere on this page)
Afbau Ost HARVESTS
If by my laws you walk, and my commands you keep, and observe them,
June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005
ORCHARD SERVICES F&V time: This blog's date function is so set as to start a new day at approximately local sunset. (Why, if we have "day" and "night," should a new "day" start in the middle of the night?) FRUITS: Support your local, organic growers; and, plant vines and fig trees and pomegranates for the generations to come...
VOTES: For democratization and full representation, for environmental sustainability, social justice, and peace, always sincerely... |
Powered by WordPress
Around here, most pundits are up in arms … but then again that’s what they’re paid for.
The reaction among my friends and family ranges from irritation to indifference. From my understanding, people are more concern about the government taking what they see as a 3 month holiday than they are about the constitutional issue or the parliamentary precedent. I personally don’t give much credibility to the theory that politicians are on vacation when Parliament isn’t sitting. Nor do I give much credibility to the notion that the government cannot work on the economic recovery when Parliament is sitting, which was the official justification for prorogation.
The opposition did manage to pull an anti-prorogation rally day that attracted about 25 000 people around the country. The Tories did take a relatively significant hit in polls. My guess is that people who are making the biggest fuss about this weren’t going to vote for the Conservatives any way and that the media will progressively forget about it once they get an other squeaky toy to chew on.
For my part, I think this move was stupid and childish, but I’ll probably still vote for the Conservatives next time I’m called to the polls and I don’t think this prorogation business will be an issue next election.
Seed planted by Maxime — 07 February 2010 @ 19:56
Maxime, thanks for being the first Canadian to comment on this one. And I am sorry for not having seen your comment in the moderation queue until two days had gone by.
Seed planted by MSS — 10 February 2010 @ 01:51
A lot of people I know are upset about how partisan and calculating proroguing parliament was. A lot of other people I know are somewhat amused.
One T-shirt I saw here: http://suaveactivist.com sums up the amused sentiment. It’s a smiling Harper with the title “Going Prorogue”. Reminds me of Sarah Palin!
Seed planted by Angus — 16 February 2010 @ 22:22
Maybe Canadians reformers have been too busy with the anti-prorogation protests to look in on Fruits and Votes.
This was no ordinary annual prorogation. In that case it would have been shortly before the new throne speech, after the work of the session had been completed.
In this case, the last day before the Christmas adjournment the House of Commons had passed a motion by a three-vote margin requiring production of the documents requested by the parliamentary committee investigating the Afghan-detainee-transfer affair. The government apparently intended to refuse, which would put them in contempt of parliament. The Prime Minister had no plan for what would happen next. (If he has one now, he still has not said so.) So he prorogued in order for the government, he said, to “recalibrate” its agenda. A spate of recalibration and prorogation jokes followed.
But suspending parliament to escape a contempt motion looked like no joke. It looked like suspending democracy.
Canada’s national newspaper, the Globe and Mail, took it very seriously. As soon as Harper announced the prorogation, they wrote an extremely rare front-page editorial denouncing the decision to “shut down parliamentary debate entirely.”
More than 175 political scientists and professors wrote
an open letter saying “the Prime Minister has violated the trust of Parliament and of the Canadian people.”
Even the Economist in Britain took notice.
The January 23rd rallies in 60 cities were a very spontaneous event. They followed a spontaneous collection of Facebook protests which, in only a few days, resulted in a consensus on which Facebook site to join, which very soon had 25,000 members. The media took notice. In a couple more weeks it had 210,000 members. But no one knew whether this would translate into bodies on the streets. No one had ever seen rallies organized on Facebook. Even in our small town, when we expected 40 people to meet in front of the MP’s office, we got 150, most of whom had only read about it in the local daily the day before.
It all took the media and pollsters by surprise. Pollsters had predicted there would be no reaction, that Canadians wouldn’t care. That fed the protests: people wanted to show they did care.
The Globe followed up with a full-page editorial the day before the Jan. 23rd rallies. And another the Monday after.
The protests have continued. The Facebook group has grown to 225,647. Everyone has a Facebook page: Stephen Harper’s has 30,938 fans. As an offshoot of the Facebook protests, the page “Can this Onion Ring get more fans than Stephen Harper?” has 180,014 fans, while its francophone counterpart “Pour que ce stylo ait plus d’amis que Stephen Harper” has another 51,988.
Seed planted by Wilf Day — 21 February 2010 @ 16:29
Prorogation has almost completely died out in Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific, as described in a 2004 paper by the speaker of the WA legislative assembly. The Australian senate has a peculiar reaction to prorogations, they insist they are not effected by them and have made a point of meeting after a prorogation. Incidentally, the same paper tells us the clever New Zealanders have abolished the Speech from the Throne/Governor-General’s Speech in favour of an annual statement to parliament by the prime minister which is then subject to debate.
Seed planted by Alan — 23 February 2010 @ 14:59
Didn’t Carmen Lawrence, as West Australian Premier, prorogue Parliament before the 1989 election to stop an Upper House committee inquiring into damaging allegations about the “WA Inc” scandals? (relying on memory as I can’t find a reference on Wikipedia).
Seed planted by Tom Round — 23 February 2010 @ 22:11
@Tom
I think you are right although I am equally devoid of a citation.
No Right Turn reports that the Canadian disease is spreading with a prorogation until September in the Cook Islands. Clearly, the New Zealand practice of requiring a vote of the house before a dissolution or prorogation is better. In fact it is hard to see why prorogation is needed in a democracy at all.
Seed planted by Alan — 23 February 2010 @ 23:49