google
yahoo
bing

THE CORE

This is the Web-log of Professor Matthew Shugart ("MSS"); however, other "planters" have been invited to contribute. Please check the "Planted by" line to see the author of the post you are reading.

The Mission of F&V

About the banner

Core principles:

Henry Droop on the "moderate non-partisan section"

Madison on "dangers from abroad" and "the fetters... on liberty"

FRUITS: Support your local, organic growers; and, plant vines and fig trees and pomegranates for the generations to come...

VOTES: For democratization and full representation, for environmental sustainability, social justice, and peace, always sincerely...

The Head Orchardist's other sites:
PRESERVED FRUIT
orchard blocks
  • All
  • FRUITS
  • VOTES
  • wide open spaces
  • 01 May 2006

    Planted by MSS
    Planted in: Australia, VOTES

    Greg asks a good question about the literature on compulsory voting in the comments. I hope someone knows the answer.

    The Institute for Public Policy Research in the U.K. has published a report advocating compulsory voting, to counter the trend in recent British elections towards lower voter turnout. Turnout was around 60% in the last two general elections–the lowest since World War I.

    This report comes just a couple of months after the Power Inquiry accounted for, among other things, the low voting turnout in the U.K., specifically blaming first-past-the-post voting and other institutional obstacles to voters’ sense of political efficacy.

    In the USA, it is worth noting, 60% would be considered a high turnout and a sign that democracy had been reinvigorated. In fact, the nearly 60% turnout in the 2004 presidential election practically generated spontaneous celebration from the punditry class. But, in fact, American electoral turnout is among the very lowest of the established democracies.

    Just today I had received the most recent Journal of Theoretical Politics, which happens to contain an article by Lisa Hill entitled “Low Voter Turnout in the United States: Is Compulsory Voting a Viable Solution?” Here is its abstract:

    America’s turnout problem is among the worst of any of the established democracies. Even a reform as sweeping as the NVRA (Motor Voter Act) has failed to remedy it. Adopting an empirically informed normative approach, the author proposes and defends an ambitious solution: compulsory voting. Anticipating considerable resistance to this proposal, the article explores likely cultural, practical, political and legal barriers to its introduction and, in some cases, suggests strategies for overcoming them. It is concluded that most of the likely impediments are not technically, but rather, culturally and politically intractable. Yet, compulsory voting could have many benefits. Not only could it improve turnout more effectively than any other measure, but it could also close America’s yawning SES voting gap, limit some of the problems associated with campaign finance and break the cycle of low efficacy, alienation, non-participation and exclusion that characterizes American politics. Finally, compulsory voting can serve and protect such important democratic values as representativeness, legitimacy and political equality.

    About thirty democracies currently have compulsory voting in elections for the lower house of parliament (and presidency, if any). Included among these democracies are Australia, Belgium, and Costa Rica.

    The liberal in me recoils at the idea of governments telling citizens of a free society that they have to participate. The social democrat in me says there are certain things that citizens in a free society are not free to disengage from. Ultimately, the green in me says that voting is not enough, but it’s a good start, and it needs to be not mandatory, but meaningful, so that nearly all citizens will participate voluntarily.

    A debate worth having–on both sides of the Atlantic.

    More, including some good links on the debate, at Make My Vount Count (of course).

    Propagation:


    13 ideas sprouting

    1. Is there evidence that compulsory voting decreases alienation, exclusion, etc.? I know Chileans who feel their vote does not matter, a sentiment that does not change as they do their legally bound duty. In the U.S., we would also have to make the day a holiday, a move that is bound to spark opposition.

      Seed planted by Greg — 02 May 2006 @ 04:13

    2. I think I mostly agree with the liberal in you (surprise, surprise). You can force a citizen to vote, but you can’t make him/her take it seriously.

      I might like a compromise: compulsory voting with blank/spoiled ballots allowed and counted, and by-elections in districts where “blank” wins a plurality. This might make parties take alienation/apathy more seriously than with the vague signal provided by low turnout.

      On the other hand, that sounds perhaps a bit too Soviet…

      Seed planted by Mike — 02 May 2006 @ 09:23

    3. Despite the ‘Soviet’ echo, I’m with Mike’s compromise. This raises another question, which might be answered in the literature that I do not know: Are rates of blank and spoiled ballots higher where voting is compulsory?

      Two problems (at least) with answering that:

      (1) We would also need to control for effects of electoral systems (and other factors) on blank and spoiled ballots. Presumably more choices–as with PR–gives more voters something to vote for if forced to go to the polls and drop a ballot in the box. Fewer choices, more likelihood that the “not serious” will cast a blank or spoiled ballot (by hpyothesis).

      (2) Not all countries electoral agencies report blank or spoiled ballots. (Try getting that for the USA, for example.)

      Seed planted by MShugart — 02 May 2006 @ 11:11

    4. Thanks for the coverage :)

      As for the question: “Are rates of blank and spoiled ballots higher where voting is compulsory?”

      The simple answer is yes, but it’s hard to find by how much exactly. It’s not, as far as I know, anywhere near as high as the abstention count under non-compulsory voting, as when forced, most people vote for someone, even if they just pick the candidate with the funniest name or the person at the top of the ballot (incidentally, in some Australian states being at the top of the ballot can be the difference between winning and losing).

      A lot of the time, people are simply unaware that they can leave the ballot blank.

      One thing I did find was this, which contains the gem that: “While voting is compulsory, South Australian ballot papers are unique in including an instruction that informs the voter that they do not have to mark the ballot paper. This results in South Australian elections having the country’s highest proportion of blank ballot papers. At the 2002 state election, 42.3% of all informal [I believe this just means ones that aren't counted for whatever reason] ballot papers were left entirely blank, compared to only 21.4 per cent at the 2001 Federal election.”

      Informal ballots still only make up a few percent of the total though.

      In answer to Greg’s question: “Is there evidence that compulsory voting decreases alienation, exclusion, etc.?”

      I would say it was impossible to tell, because compulsory voting just masks the problems of alienation and exclusion. There is no need to try harder to re-engage the excluded if you can just force them to engage themselves, in however spurious a manner. The case in the UK would be that the excluded groups (mainly poor and young) would be more likely to vote Labour, but have left the Labour party alone since it shifted rightwards. If forced to vote, most would vote Labour for the hell of it, but nothing would actually have changed.

      Seed planted by Paul Davies — 03 May 2006 @ 01:08

    5. The recent Thai election turned on a none-of-these option. Voters used it in sufficient numbers to defeat government candidates despite the opposition boycott.

      Incidentally Australia has a history of informal referendums with campaigns to write messages like ‘No dams’ on the ballots and the electoral commission has to report them.

      It seems to me that a none-of-these option answers the liberal qualm.

      Seed planted by Alan — 04 May 2006 @ 00:32

    6. The Australian Electoral Commission has just released an information paper (pdf).

      Seed planted by Alan — 04 May 2006 @ 00:54

    7. I know of one case of an informal referendum having impact: The Colombian constitutional referendum of March, 1990. At the time, voters voted by acquiring the sub-party lists of their (or their patron’s) choice before going to the polls and placing them in a ballot envelope. There were, in that election, six different ballot papers that a voter could deposit (two houses of congress, departmental assembly, local offices, Liberal presidential primary, etc.). A campaign for calling a constitutional assembly (not something recognized under the constitution then in effect) created a movement called the septima papeleta (the seventh slip of paper), calling on people to deposit a slip calling for the convocation of a constituent assembly. These informal ballots were printed in newspapers by the supporters of the referendum, and voters could cut them out and add them to their ballot envelope. The response was overwhelming, and under an executive decree, they were counted and officially reported, eventually leading to the new constitution of 1991. (There was some quasi-official support for the whole thing, as the president at the time had tried to get some reforms through congress and failed.)

      Seed planted by MShugart — 04 May 2006 @ 06:33

    8. Pacific Beat (audio only) has some interesting stuff on informal voting by the EU Observer Mission for the Fiji general election.

      The election is on Saturday.

      Voting is compulsory in Fiji and the system is STV.* An older article by the Australian Parliamentary Library summarises the country’s somewhat troubled constitutional and political history.

      Fiji is notable as the only Pacific Forum nation to have suffered military and civilian coups.

      [* Actually, alternative vote (STV's single-seat-district equivalent), right?--ed.]

      Seed planted by Alan — 05 May 2006 @ 09:19

    9. I think it is the duty of people who do not understand who they are voting for and why, to NOT vote. So, what is needed is not more voters per se, but more informed citizens, who are then more likely to vote. To tackle the turnout problem by mandating voting is to mistake the symptom for the disease.

      Seed planted by WRY — 05 May 2006 @ 14:04

    10. WRY, I tend to agree that tackling the turnout problem by mandating turnout is entirely the wrong way to go.

      Seed planted by MShugart — 05 May 2006 @ 15:24

    11. I think it is factually inaccurate and distinctly elitist to assume that non-voters are uninformed voters. My brother and his wife lived in England during one of the Euro-referendums. They disagreed on how to vote. They did a fairly precise calculation that since they were going to vote in opposite ways they would only cancel each other out and there was no point voting. So there are at least some cases of an informed decision not to vote.

      The Power Inquiry found two large groups of non-voters. One was the traditional social exclusion group, although they showed only marginally less knowledge of electoral politics than the electorate as a whole. The second was a group who were extremely well-informed and often active in community groups and the like, but just did not identify with any party.

      The real benefit of compulsory voting is that it kills dead the gap in socio-economic status between voters and non-voters, and that gap does survive the Power Inquiry’s empirical research, it just doesn’t translate into ignorance as a reason not to vote.

      In Australia the (conservative) Liberal party is generally in favour of voluntary voting because their internal research tells them they’d gain a 5% advantage from the SES gap.

      It’s obvious there is a problem with conscripting people to vote for existing parties. The solution to that is a none of these option, not counterfactual grandiloquence about the ignorance of non-voters. It’s hard to see how biasing the electorate in favour of parties of resistance is a splendid example of informed decision-making on electoral design.

      Seed planted by Alan — 05 May 2006 @ 20:28

    12. In Perú, voting is mandatory for citizens between 18 and 70 years of age; you can also get a dispensation for medical reasons (and a few others). It’s pretty well enforced: your identity card is marked when you vote, so you can’t use it for administrative procedures until you pay the fine, which is about US$40.

      Turnout is typically around 85-90%, and there are generally a lot of blank and spoiled ballots. It’s hard to know how many of the spoiled ballots are actually incorrectly filled out rather than deliberately spoiled — probably most — but the number of blank ballots in the recent election was more than 10%.

      Mandatory voting benefits political groups without much organizational capacity, because well-organized political groups are more effective at vote-pulling. In Perú, for example, I would expect that making voting non-mandatory would primarily benefit Apra. However, it would also benefit abstencionist campaigns (including those conducted with the threat of violence), which are an unfortunate and prominent feature of South American politics in general.

      Seed planted by Rici — 11 May 2006 @ 09:37

    13. As a young non-voter I would like to suggest my personal reasons for this action.

      Who is there to vote for?

      It seems to me like a tired two horse race around a seriously corrupted track purely fuelled by it’s investors. I’m don’t want to visit a race track like that, I’m blatently going to lose my money.

      They say voting is to create freedom but that’s just spin. To control a child you don’t ask it what it wants to do. you say tidy your room or go to bed. To control a nation you say Labour or Conservative? Freedom in the west is propaganda.

      Compulsory schooling and control on media has led to, in my humble opinion, a zombie world. My only response as a slave to the system is to try to ignore these other kids in the playground playing politics. Don’t make voting compulsory because I quite frankly can’t be bothered. I spend too much of my time accounting for myself and financing their fun already.
      When you’re voting, I’ll be playing a round of cards with a spliff because that’s what I’ld rather be doing with my limited ‘freedom’.

      Seed planted by Linsey — 01 October 2006 @ 18:29

    RSS feed for comments on this post.

    TrackBacks

    To graft a scion to this planting, please use the following URL:
    http://fruitsandvotes.com/blog/wp-trackback.php?p=718
    (Non-MT bloggers click here to send pings.)

    Grafted scions that are not compatible with this planting's stock will die or be pruned out by the Orchardist.

    About the comment form

    Please note that the name you enter below and the first several words of your comment will appear on the right sidebar of the blog's front page, under "Propagation." New propagators might want to look at the comment policy.

    Please do not enter long URLs into the seedbed. Either mark them up using html hyperlinks or convert them to a "tiny URL." Thank you!

    Sorry, this soil has been over-planted.

    FRUIT FEEDS
    PROPAGATION
    Recent comments.

  • Labor-Green agreement (14)
    • Tom Round: [Note for the record that I spotted the India/ UK/ Canada/ Aust/ NZ hung parliaments before reading Dunleavy's post a few days back......
    • Ed: Actually, the sudden rash of uncontrolled (or hung, or balanced) parliaments elected single member districts cuts against both sides of the...
    • Wilf Day: Duverger’s Law is clearly dead, and the idea of using a voting system to artificially create Parliamentary majorities is on its...
    • Ed: My reading of Australian poltics is probably flawed, since I am not Australian, plus the situation now is unusually fluid. That said is the...
    • Ed: In the following situation: 1) a government determining House has an even number of deputies, 2) the government party or parties have exact...
    • Tom Round: From Wilkie to Franklin… No, not the 1940 US presidential election, but the Tasmanian House of Assembly. Looks like the 1998...
    • Alan: It’s no defence of a silly rule, but Australia did not have a party system when the constitution was written. In my view the rule in...
    • Bancki: The Speaker does not vote in the House except in the event of a tied vote. I’ve always found this to be a strange rule: - when a...
    • Alan: 74 Labor 3 independents 73 Coalition.
    • Tom Round: Alan, the Senate ruled early in its history (this is mentioned somewhere in Quick & Garran) that sec 17’s “the Senate...
    • Alan: @Tom s57 and s128 apply to very specific situations and are therefore exceptions to a general rule. I suggest the relevant provision is s40:...
    • Tom Round: [What Alan said, +] … or if a non-Govt MP is elected Speaker, and thus can vote only to break a tie, which won’t arise in a...
    • Vasi: Is there any recent precedent for such an agreement in Australia? If Labor and the Greens are committing to reliably vote together until the...
    • Alan: The Labor-Green alignment actually falls 2, not 3, short of a majority. People have tended to assume an absolute majority of 76 is required....
  • CROSS-POLLINATION

    FRUITS

    morn_blms_corralito.jpg

    The Fruit Blog (Fruit & fruit breeding)
    Daley's Fruit Tree Blog
    Orchards Forever
    The Orchard Keeper
    The Ethicurean
    The Jew and the Carrot
    Small farms ("real people & real food")
    Life begins at 30 (Farmers markets, etc.)
    Banana
    Festival of Trees
    Rare Fruit News Online
    Cloudforest Cafe


    VOTES

    bulgaria_protest copy

    Comparative democracy

    Psephos (Adam Carr's data archive)
    Electoral Panorama
    World Elections
    African Elections Database
    M. Herrera's Electoral Calendar
    Electoral Geography (Data archive)
    Michael Gallagher's data archive
    Election Finance (Blog, data archive)
    IFES
    Election Law (Rick Hasen)
    VoteLaw (Edward Still)
    Ballot Access News

    Electoral and Political Reform

    The FairVote Blog (US)
    Make my vote count (UK)
    Wilf Day (Canada)
    democraticSPACE (Canada)
    Citizens Assembly Blog (dormant)


    POLITOLOGY

    Blogs of political analysis

    PoliBlog
    Arms and Influence (dormant?)
    Outside the Beltway
    Political Science Weblog (abstracts)
    Frontloading HQ (Josh Putnam)
    FiveThirtyEight
    Vote View (Keith Poole)
    The Monkey Cage
    Political Arithmetik (dormant)
    Pollster.com
    Polysigh
    Reflective Pundit
    Rustbelt Intellectual
    Simon Jackman
    The semi-presidential one
    Josep Colomer
    Chapel Hill Treehouse (dormant)
    Political Behavior (dormant)
    The Democratic Piece
    Countries at the Crossroads (Freedom House blog)
    Jacob T. Levy

    REGIONAL ANALYSIS

    Canada

    Crawl Across the Ocean
    Idealistic Pragmatist
    Paulitics
    Pith and Substance

    Europe

    Centre for European Politics
    Dr Sean's Diary
    Euro Trib
    A Fistful of Euros

    Latin America

    Bloggings by boz
    Colombia: A PoliBlog Sideblog
    El Criador de Gorilas
    Pronto!
    Two Weeks Notice
    Central American Politics

    S.W. Asia & E. Mediterranean

    Informed Comment Global Affairs
    Prospects for Peace
    Lisa Goldman
    Michael J. Totten

    Africa

    La Constitution en Afrique

    E. Asia

    Frozen Garlic (Taiwan elections)

    New Zealand

    Kiwiblog
    No Right Turn

    OTHER SOCIAL SCIENCE BLOGS

    Crooked Timber
    Statistical Modeling
    Social Science Statistics
    Cold Spring Shops
    Marginal Revolution
    Brad DeLong
    Greg Mankiw

    SUN & MOON

    CURRENT MOON

    NEWS

    ABC

    BBC

    CBC

    Democracy Now!

    Deutsche Welle

    El Tiempo

    Guardian

    Haaretz

    Hindustan Times

    The Independent

    Irish Times

    NZ Stuff

    RFE/RL

    ORGANIZATIONS

    About/disclaimer

    California Rare Fruit Growers

    Center for Voting and Democracy

    Californians for Electoral Reform

    Society for American Baseball Research

    Link TV

    SCION EXCHANGE

    HARVESTS
    ORCHARD SERVICES

    F&V time: This blog's date function is so set as to start a new day at approximately local sunset. (Why, if we have "day" and "night," should a new "day" start in the middle of the night?)

    F&V Coordinates: A compass may be helpful for navigating the orchard--a Political Compass, that is.

    Your Orchardist's coordinates:

    • –3.88 Economic left
    • –6.26 Social libertarian
    ...approximately the location of The Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand and close to the ideological positions of Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, and Ralph Nader.

    Fruits & Votes encourages the flourishing of all democratic political viewpoints, respectfully presented.

    outlook repair software wordpress stats

    Powered by WordPress