THE CORE

Fruits & Votes is the Web-log of Matthew S. Shugart ("MSS"), Professor of Political Science, University of California, Davis.

Perspectives on electoral systems, constitutional design, and policy around the world, based primarily on my research interests.

Also experiences with growing many varieties of fruit (always organic) and other personal interests. Please see the Mission Statement for more. (There is also an explanation of the banner.)

Other "planters" have been invited to contribute. Please check the "Planted by" line to see the author of the post you are reading.

Join the conversation. Comments are always open. Except, that is, when Word Press mysteriously shuts them down, which happens with distressing frequency.

Core principles:

Henry Droop on the "moderate non-partisan section"

Madison on "dangers from abroad" and "the fetters... on liberty"

The Head Orchardist's other sites:

PRESERVED FRUIT
orchard blocks
  • All
  • FRUITS
  • VOTES
  • wide open spaces
  • 29 June 2006

    Planted by MSS
    Planted in: Mexico; VOTES

    Even though I am co-editing a volume on Mexican elections and lawmaking (which I had once dreamed of having completed before the 2006 election), I have not addressed this Sunday’s election here in some time.

    Courtesy of boz’s presentation of the data, I took a look at a series of late polls. Averaging of the nine polls of the week of 23 June gives us the following:

      López Obrador (PRD): 33.6%
      Calderón (PAN/Fox’s party): 32.7
      Madrazo (PRI-asaurus): 24.2

    I am not sure of the margin of error on each of these polls, but I know that for at least some of them, it is around +/- 3 percentage points. Applying that margin to each candidate, we get average ranges of:

      López Obrador: 31-37
      Calderón: 30-36
      Madrazo: 21-27

    The polls thus pretty clearly agree that the race is too close to call between Calderón and López Obrador (“AMLO”), and that Madrazo is in third place. However, at least two of the polls that boz reports (Mitofsky and Zogby) do not clearly separate second and third place. In fact, Zogby does not clearly separate first and third place. Zogby has the race as Calderón 30, AMLO 27, Madrazo 24. Assuming +/- 3 MOE, that is no different from a three-way dead heat of three candidates at 27%. Zogby also has the largest undecided or “other” (there are two very minor candidates running) of any of these polls (19%), which presumably means they are more conservative in assigning “leaners” to one candidate or the other.

    Other polls have a very large gap between first and third, even if none can separate AMLO and Calderón with certainty. For instance Universal has it AMLO 36, Calderón 34, Madrazo 26. Milenio and Marketing Político have Madrazo on 22% and GEA-ISA has him on 20%, but all of these put only two points between the leaders.

    While it is hard to concoct a believable scenario in which Madrazo wins, the fact that he has gained a bit in many polls late in the campaign and that his third place is not decisive in several of them is bad news in at least two respects. First, it reduces the pressure on weaker supporters of the PRI to defect, because they may not be convinced that their candidate has no chance. Second, it increases the chance that the candidate who does win might have lost had more PRI voters defected to whichever of the other two is their second choice. My hunch is that Madrazo being in a strong third place (and perhaps second) helps AMLO, on the grounds that AMLO’s image as the rabble-rouser makes him less likely to pick up late PRI defectors than the “conservative” (in almost any sense of that word) Calderón. More PRI voters sticking with Madrazo means fewer votes shifting late to Calderón.

    It is possible that the PRI vote is under-sampled, given its strength in rural areas, and out of this possibility come the scenarios (unlikely though they may be) in which Madrazo ekes out a surprising win. But I do think this is indeed unlikely, because I still expect few undecideds to go for Madrazo in the end and many soft supporters of the PRI ultimately to vote tactically, and thus to cancel out any under-sampled PRI vote. The fact that a federation of formerly PRI-affiliated unions endorsed AMLO recently throws further cold water on the chances of a late recovery by the PRI.

    I would not bet on this election, as it really could go either way between Calderón and AMLO.

    The presidential election is decided by plurality, so there will be no second round even if, as seems likely, the winner has well under 40% of the vote and a very small margin.

    The other thing to watch is the congressional race. In 2000, Mexican voters showed some, albeit limited, willingness to split tickets. Thus the PRI in congress could slightly outpoll its presidential result. There is no direct translation of national vote shares to seats in the 500-seat Chamber of Deputies; contrary to some otherwise reputable sources, Mexico’s mixed-member electoral system is not MMP, but parallel.* It is also a rare mixed-member system with a single vote: The voter votes for a candidate in his or her single-seat district, where the plurality prevails, and this vote is also pooled to the separate contest for list seats (closed regional lists).

    Because of the single vote for both candidate and list, every party has a strong incentive to run a candidate in every district, even if it clearly can’t win a given district. If it does not have a “face” in a district, it has no way to obtain list votes in that district. And, of course, because of the single vote, there is no incentive for you if you are a voter to defect from your first choice party’s candidate, even if he or she can’t win your district. Thus many districts will be won by narrow margins and much less than 50%, and this will benefit whichever party has the greatest regional spread and harm any party that is regionally concentrated. This aspect of the system is much more likely to give a (small) seat bonus to the PRI than to the PAN, and to harm the PRD.

    The system also puts a potential premium on parties’ having attractive candidates, given that the candidates are what the voter must vote for. However, there is not much evidence that voters care much about candidates (there is some, however). The development of a “personal vote” is hampered by the ban on consecutive terms in all elections in Mexico. No incumbents are running for reelection to their seats.

    It is very possible that the result could be López Obrador as president with not even one third of congressional seats–the share needed to sustain a veto. If Calderón were to win, he, too, could be short of one third.

    In the 128-seat Senate, all of which is also elected Sunday–there is no chance that any party will have a majority.**

    Coalition-building will be even more important to Sunday’s winner than it was to Fox–and likely more difficult.

    Of course, La Profesora Abstraída has been covering the campaign all along.

    * The only senses in which the electoral system is not parallel (MMM) are in two ways that will not be triggered in this election: No party may have an overrepresentation of more than eight percentage points above its nationwide Chamber vote share, nor more than 300 seats. Otherwise, it is a pure parallel system.

    ** Two senators from each state are elected by the leading party in that state, one from the second party, and another 32 nationwide by proportional representation, in parallel.

    Propagation: Seeds & scions (8)


    PoliBlog: A Rough Draft of my Thoughts grafted Election Watch: Mexico
    PoliBlog: A Rough Draft of my Thoughts » More on Mexico grafted [...] Now, given that Matthew is currently co-editing a book on Mexican elections, he has thought about this issue more than I have, so I await his explanation/prescription. Filed under: Latin America, Elections [...]
    The Glittering Eye » Blog Archive » The Mexican presidential election grafted [...] UPDATE:  Commentary on the election from Steven Taylor of Poliblog and Mathew Shugart of Fruits and Votes. [...]

    8 ideas sprouting »

    1. Sorry I didn’t get back to your question from my comment section. El Universal’s Margin or Error is 2.9%. Most polls MOEs are between 2.5% and 4%.

      Most polling firms’ sampling methods are pretty good, but I’m not so convinced by their “likely voter” models.

      Seed planted by boz — 29 June 2006 @ 13:17

    2. Thanks, boz, and I’m not convinced by pollsters’ likely-voter models for US elections, even though they have a lot more experience.

      Seed planted by MSS — 29 June 2006 @ 13:25

    3. Vicente Fox was interviewed yesterday by Le Figaro, and suggested that Mexico adopt some form of ballotage in order to give the president “more legitimacy” (in French; La Jornada summarizes the interview in Spanish.)

      I was at a meeting organized by Propuesta Ciudadana here in Perú on Wednesday, at which it was suggested (by Sinesio López, a prominent political analyst who currently heads the National Library) that ballotage in Perú might provide legitimacy but doesn’t improve governability. He suggests changing to Bolivia’s system.

      Meanwhile, Bolivia is about to hold convene a Constitutional Assembly. Who knows what they will decide to change to.

      Is it just that the grass is always greener on the neighbouring electoral pasture? *

      While I could hardly disagree with the subtitle of Fernando Tuesta’s monogram on electoral processes — Las Reglas También Cuentan — I wonder if there is too much of a tendency to blame problems on the rules. It seems to me that even an imperfect electoral system — and aren’t they all? — could be better than having a different system for every election.

      * As additional evidence for “the grass is always greener”, I note that the previous electoral reform in Bolivia was to move from closed-list PR to MMP, in order to bring representatives closer to the people. Meanwhile, López and many others are suggesting that Perú move from open-list PR to closed-list PR, in order to make political parties more coherent.

      (Tuesta recommends MMP, or at least he did when he wrote the book. I can’t see how that would be an improvement over the current system, though; it cannot be less centripetal than fully open-list PR in small districts, can it? I would expect it to be even more centripetal.)

      Seed planted by Rici — 30 June 2006 @ 19:27

    4. Election Watch: Mexico

      Today Mexicans go to the polls to elect a new President, a new Congress, the Mayor of Mexico City and governors in some of the states. (Info in english here from the IFE (The Federal Election Institute) can be found here (h/t: La Profesora Abstraid…

      Scion grafted by PoliBlog: A Rough Draft of my Thoughts — 02 July 2006 @ 06:56

    5. [...] UPDATE:  Commentary on the election from Steven Taylor of Poliblog and Mathew Shugart of Fruits and Votes. [...]

      Scion grafted by The Glittering Eye » Blog Archive » The Mexican presidential election — 02 July 2006 @ 08:06

    6. Excellent comment, Rici! I share your skepticism about a two-round system, and especially in a three-party system. I rather like Bolivia’s “second round” in congress, though as you note, there is no such thing as an electoral system without flaws. I wonder, if the congress selects the executive, should there not also be a means for it to replace it (with a “constructive” vote)?

      Thanks for the info on the idea of CLPR to make Peruvian parties more coherent–a proposition that is not as straightforward as it seems. I could say the same thing about the idea that MMP will enhance accountability in existing CLPR systems. Both expectations are perfectly reasonable from a theoretical standpoint, but there are lots of assumptions hidden behind those propositions and various “lurking” variables that can confound the relationship in reality.

      I am not fond of the idea of introducing MMP into already fragmented party systems. But that’s a theme for another thread.

      Finally, Rici, your links did not render in the posting. Send the URLs to me at my at my academic address (which I know you have, or can find again) and I will insert them for you.

      Seed planted by MSS — 02 July 2006 @ 10:07

    7. Has each Mexican voter also (as with the chamber elections) only one senate vote that counts 1° for the distribution at state level (2 for the first party and 1 for the second party) and 2° for the distribution at federal level (proportional) ?

      [Yes, the Mexican voter gets one Senate vote, one Chamber vote, and one presidential vote, all on separate ballot papers, and all requiring a single mark for one party.--ed.]

      Seed planted by Bancki — 03 July 2006 @ 01:16

    8. [...] Now, given that Matthew is currently co-editing a book on Mexican elections, he has thought about this issue more than I have, so I await his explanation/prescription. Filed under: Latin America, Elections [...]

      Scion grafted by PoliBlog: A Rough Draft of my Thoughts » More on Mexico — 09 July 2006 @ 07:56

    RSS feed for comments on this post.

    TrackBacks

    To graft a scion to this planting, please use the following URL:
    http://fruitsandvotes.com/blog/wp-trackback.php?p=769
    (Non-MT bloggers click here to send pings.)

    Grafted scions that are not compatible with this planting's stock will die or be pruned out by the Orchardist.

    About the comment form

    Please note that the name you enter below and the first several words of your comment will appear on the right sidebar of the blog's front page, under "Propagation." New propagators might want to look at the comment policy.

    Please do not enter long URLs into the seedbed. Either mark them up using html hyperlinks or convert them to a "tiny URL." Thank you!

    Seedbed

    The soil is ready for planting:

    `

    FRUIT FEEDS
    PROPAGATION
    Recent comments.

  • Irish Constitutional Convention: Keep STV (19)
    • Tom Round: {{MSS, COULD YOU PLEASE REPLACE MY BLANK UNDERSCORES WITH “THREE 221; AND MY SECOND 2 WITH A 3? THEN DELETE THIS? THANKS}}
    • Tom Round: Whether even DMs are good or bad depends a lot on their context and _____ factors in particular: 1. MAGNITUDE. Chilean 2-seaters are a...
    • MSS: I see the problem with even-numbered district magnitudes (M) when M=2 or M=4, but it is not obvious to me that it remains an issue when M=6...
    • Vasi: Obviously even DMs are a problem if there are only two parties/blocs, or if DM is very small. But do we know if they significantly impact...
    • Tom Round: Re district magnitude: It would be interesting if Ireland moves “up” ; to 5-seaters (I assume the minimum will also be the de...
    • Alan: I wonder to what extent the European constitutions that mandate resignation originally adopted the practice from Westminster and then did not...
    • DC: @JD, there is actually a provision where Deputies or Senators who resign to become Ministers (replaced by their substitute, or “suppl...
    • DC: While they use STV in Ireland for European Parliament elections, the candidates run with a list of “replacem ent candidates̶ 1;, so...
    • JD: If I’m not much mistaken, Ed, French ministers appoint a substitute deputy when they serve in the cabinet, but if they are sacked and/or...
    • Ed: How do the French handle this? I thought that the constitution of the Fifth Republic banned ministers from serving in Parliament (or just the...
    • Mark Roth: JD, You are correct in what you say about current laws about Irish by-elections. However, if ministers were to resign their seats with...
    • JD: Mark: I don’t see how asking ministers to resign from the Dail, “would be done as in the Netherlands and suggested for Israel....
  • The problems with FPTP– and with AV (53)
    • Ed: Toronto is going to AV or something similar to elect its mayor: http://www.calg arygrit.ca/?p=5 223 As you might expect, this happened due to...
  • First Bundestag member of African origin? (11)
    • JD: Elections for party leader are also sometimes somewhat strangely known as ‘lijsttre kker referendum̵ 7; in the NetherlandsR 30;
  • CROSS-POLLINATION

    FRUITS

    morn_blms_corralito.jpg

    The Fruit Blog (Fruit & fruit breeding)
    Daley's Fruit Tree Blog
    Orchards Forever
    The Orchard Keeper
    The Ethicurean
    The Jew and the Carrot
    Small farms ("real people & real food")
    Life begins at 30 (Farmers markets, etc.)
    Banana
    Festival of Trees
    Rare Fruit News Online
    Cloudforest Cafe


    VOTES

    bulgaria_protest copy

    Comparative democracy

    Psephos (Adam Carr's data archive)
    Electoral Panorama
    World Elections
    African Elections Database
    M. Herrera's Electoral Calendar
    Electoral Geography (Data archive)
    Michael Gallagher's data archive
    Election Finance (Blog, data archive)
    IFES
    Election Law (Rick Hasen)
    VoteLaw (Edward Still)
    Ballot Access News

    Electoral and Political Reform

    The FairVote Blog (US)
    Make my vote count (UK)
    Wilf Day (Canada)
    democraticSPACE (Canada)
    Citizens Assembly Blog (dormant)


    POLITOLOGY

    Blogs of political analysis

    PoliBlog
    Arms and Influence (dormant)
    Outside the Beltway
    Political Science Weblog (abstracts)
    Ideological Cartography (Adam Bonica)
    Frontloading HQ (Josh Putnam)
    FiveThirtyEight
    Vote View (Keith Poole)
    The Monkey Cage
    A Plain Blog About Politics (Jonathan Bernstein)
    Political Arithmetik (dormant)
    Polls & Votes
    Pollster.com
    Polysigh
    Reflective Pundit
    Rustbelt Intellectual
    Simon Jackman
    The semi-presidential one
    Josep Colomer
    Chapel Hill Treehouse (dormant)
    Political Behavior (dormant)
    Dart-Throwing Chimp
    Countries at the Crossroads (Freedom House blog)
    Jacob T. Levy

    REGIONAL ANALYSIS

    Canada

    The Mace
    ThreeHundredEight
    Crawl Across the Ocean
    Idealistic Pragmatist

    Europe

    Centre for European Politics
    Dr Sean's Diary
    A Fistful of Euros
    Political Reform (Ireland)
    UK Polling Report
    British Politics & Policy (LSE)

    Latin America

    Bloggings by boz
    Two Weeks Notice

    S.W. Asia & E. Mediterranean & N. Africa

    Informed Comment Global Affairs
    Lisa Goldman
    Michael J. Totten
    Yaacov Lozowick
    Marc Lynch (@FP)
    Ahwa Talk

    Africa

    La Constitution en Afrique

    E. Asia

    Frozen Garlic (Taiwan elections)

    New Zealand

    Kiwiblog
    No Right Turn

    OTHER SOCIAL SCIENCE BLOGS

    Crooked Timber
    Statistical Modeling
    Social Science Statistics
    Cold Spring Shops
    Marginal Revolution
    Brad DeLong
    Greg Mankiw

    SUN & MOON

    CURRENT MOON

    NEWS

    ABC

    BBC

    CBC

    Democracy Now!

    Deutsche Welle

    El Tiempo

    Guardian

    Haaretz

    Hindustan Times

    The Independent

    Irish Times

    NZ Stuff

    RFE/RL

    ORGANIZATIONS

    About/disclaimer

    California Rare Fruit Growers

    Center for Voting and Democracy

    Californians for Electoral Reform

    Society for American Baseball Research

    Link TV

    SCION EXCHANGE

    HARVESTS
    ORCHARD SERVICES

    Powered by WordPress